Module 1: Getting Started

Module 2: Leadership, Vision and Organizational Culture

Module 3: Collaborative Structure and Joint Ownership

Module 4: Data-Driven Understanding of Local Reentry

Module 5: Targeted Intervention Strategies

Module 6: Screening and Assessment

Module 7: Transition Plan Development

Module 8: Targeted Transition Interventions

Module 9: Self-Evaluation and Sustainability

Section 4: Changing the Organizational Culture

This section will help you understand the organizational culture of your agency and allow you to identify the formal and informal culture that impedes or facilitates the implementation of the TJC model.

What is organizational culture?

Stanley Herman, a well known organization development consultant, defined organizational culture as the prevailing assumptions, values, and norms that characterize the management and interactions that occur in the daily operation of the organization.1

The organizational culture dictates how things are done, the type of people it attracts, who exercises authority, what behavior is rewarded (both formally and informally), and how the staff view their job and role in the organization.

Herman also introduced the idea of the organizational iceberg to depict the strength of the informal and hidden cultural elements in organizational life, which are often as powerful as the formal elements in dictating how the organization operates and changes over time. In other words, you must consider how the formal and informal aspects of your organization are interrelated when developing and implementing the TJC model.

The iceberg metaphor is quite simple:

First, picture an iceberg and remember what we were taught as kids; only a small part of an iceberg is visible above water. The tip that we see seems like the entire iceberg, but it’s actually less than 10 percent of its mass.

The formal aspects of an organization (e.g., mission, goals, policies, procedures, physical facilities, and financial resources) are the iceberg’s tip, floating above the water. Everyone pays attention to the tip without remembering that what lies under the water—the human, cultural, informal aspects of the organizational culture. These aspects often control the organization.

The Organizational Iceberg

Above the Water: Formal Organizational Aspects

  • Mission and goals
  • Job descriptions
  • Technology
  • Structured polices, procedures, and directives
  • Rules and regulations
  • Physical facilities
  • Financial resources

Waterline: Interorganization Aspects

Below the Water: Human Aspects

  • Attitudes
  • Values
  • Trust
  • Customs
  • Beliefs
  • Stereotypes
  • Traditions
  • Language
  • Behavior
  • Informal interactions
  • Group norms
  • Personality

After reviewing the organizational iceberg, think about how important it is to identify and address the “waterline” and “below the water” aspects of your organization. Remember that implementation of the TJC model will likely fail unless these human aspects support it.


Below the Water

Institutionalizing the TJC model in your agency

How do you develop an organizational culture supportive of the TJC model that becomes so strong and institutionalized that the leaders can leave and the new organizational culture continues?

The answer lies in the leaders’ ability to articulate the application of the TJC model; but more importantly, institutionalization is won or lost based upon what the leaders actually do. When implementing a model that requires change, leadership modeling is essential. Even a very articulate, charismatic leader who says all the right things cannot fool people into buying into and integrating these practices unless the leader lives, eats, and breathes the model on a consistent basis.

Click here for a TJC Leadership Profile on Ross Buitendorp, a contract manager for Network180 from Kent County, MI.

Other key points to remember when changing the organizational culture

Field note: William Rencher, Correctional Officer
Kent County Sheriff’s Office

In the Sheriff’s Office in Kent County, Michigan, correctional officers are key players in ensuring that inmates to receive the programs and services they need to transition out of jail successfully. William Rencher is a correctional officer who has worked for the Sheriff’s Office for twenty-one years, and he has devoted the majority of his time to working with inmates in the reentry pod since it opened in 2010. He supports the day-to-day activities in the reentry pod, coordinates with treatment providers to ensure that the TJC model is working effectively, helps make sure that inmates attend programming, and works with inmates to overcome any issues that may arise. In addition to this work directly with inmates, he has been actively involved in the system planning work of the TJC initiative through participating in Kent County’s TJC core team.

“I strongly believe that in order for the program to be a success, the floor officers must work as a team with the re-entry leaders to make sure the inmates follow the program rules,” says Officer Rencher. “Since corrections officers have contact with the inmates on a daily basis, it is their job to make sure that the pod expectations are being followed...For the program to be effective and its participants to succeed on the outside, they need to be able to adhere to the rules within the jail first and foremost.” By providing direct supervision and ensuring accountability, Officer Rencher demonstrates how correctional officers can play a critical role in the successful implementation of the TJC model.  


For more information:

1. 1. Christensen, Gary, E. 2004. Leadership within Corrections: The Creation of Learning Organizations. Corrections Managers’ Report. Available:

2. Flaherty-Zonis, Carol. 2007. Building Culture Strategically: A Team Approach for Corrections, published by National Institute of Corrections.

3. Foxall, Mark,. 2006. “Analyzing Our Culture to Improve Our Jail,” Douglas County Department of Corrections, Omaha, Nebraska. In National Institute of Correction's Proceedings of the Large Jail Network Meeting.

1 of 2

1 Stanley M. Herman, “What Is This Thing Called Organization Development?” Personnel Journal 50 (1971): 595–603.