Search for a type of infrastructure, a federal program, or a geography.


On this page, we’ve included all funds distributed within Maryland from the programs we've evaluated. Many of those funds are distributed to local governments and private entities, not used by the state government.

programtotal funding
National Highway Performance Program$418,076,496
Urbanized Area Formula Grants Program$223,158,940
State of Good Repair Grants Program$211,083,985
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program$203,388,565
Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program$100,000,000
Capital Investment Grants Program$94,746,841
Bridge Formula Program$88,130,751
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund for lead service line replacement$77,381,660
Clean Water State Revolving Fund$64,138,540
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program$58,505,854
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund$49,110,400
Highway Safety Improvement Program$44,898,331
Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Program$42,882,025
US Army Corps of Engineers IIJA Construction Projects$37,507,000
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund emerging contaminants$27,680,000
Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity Grant Program$26,500,000
Bus and Low- and No-Emission Grant Awards$25,000,000
National Highway Freight Program$20,840,720
Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-Saving Transportation (PROTECT) - Formula Program$20,621,341
Carbon Reduction Program$18,135,480
Low or No Emission Vehicle Program$16,765,975
Enabling Middle Mile Grant Program$15,438,845
Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities Formula Program$14,570,251
Highway Safety Programs$11,093,778
Appalachian Development Highway System$11,072,956
Clean School Bus Program$9,425,000
National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program$9,298,080
Metropolitan Planning Program$9,148,013
All Stations Accessibility Program$7,109,500
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program$5,545,248
Clean Water State Revolving Fund supplemental appropriation for emerging contaminants$4,522,000
Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program$4,367,921
Federal Transit Administration Metropolitan, Statewide, and Non-Metropolitan Planning$4,083,811
Weatherization Assistance Program$3,488,780
Railway-Highway Crossing Program$2,507,549
Reconnecting Communities Pilot Program$2,000,000
Railroad Crossing Elimination Grant Program$1,534,280
State Safety Oversight Program$1,284,668
Formula Grants for Rural Areas Program, Growing State Apportionments, Growing States and High-Density States Program (combined)$1,023,690
Bridge Investment Program$560,000
Airport Infrastructure Grants$115,000

Where Is Funding Distributed?

National Highway Performance Program

Funding amount per 1,000 residents


Compare funding received by state

National Highway Performance Program

Other states


Notes: X-axis of chart is scaled logarithmically

Is Infrastructure Funding Allocated Equitably?

For each federal program, we compared a jurisdiction’s percentile for per-capita funding received with that jurisdiction’s percentiles along a number of different demographic and need indicators. A number above 0 means a program is overfunding a jurisdiction compared with the selected indicator, and a number below 0 means the program is underfunding the jurisdiction compared with the selected indicator.

indicator Equity score
Share of population who are people of color visualization of equity score


Poverty rate visualization of equity score


Population density visualization of equity score


Median household income visualization of equity score


Annual vehicle miles per household visualization of equity score


Person trips per household visualization of equity score


Fatal accident frequency visualization of equity score


Miles of highway visualization of equity score


Car access per household visualization of equity score


Transportation staff capacity visualization of equity score


Project Credits

This data tool was funded by the Melville Charitable Trust as part of the Partnership for Equitable and Resilient Communities Initiative. We are grateful to them and to all our funders, who make it possible for Urban to advance its mission. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Funders do not determine research findings or the insights and recommendations of our experts. More information on our funding principles is available here. Read our terms of service here.