Search for a type of infrastructure, a federal program, or a geography.

Federal Transit Administration State of Good Repair Grants Program

Department of Transportation

This program offers states, counties, cities, townships, special districts, and federally recognized tribal governments funding to help transit agencies maintain high-intensity public transit and bus systems in a state of good repair. The money can go toward maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation of transit systems. Learn more at www.transit.dot.gov.

Where Is Funding Distributed?

Compare funding distribution by state

$4,183,253,511

  • Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

Formula

Competitive

How equitably were funds distributed?

To explore how programs distribute funding compared with community characteristics, we developed several equity measures:

A concentration measure, which shows how much of a program’s funding is distributed to jurisdictions with the greatest share of a selected community characteristic. Scores range from −1 to 3.

Distribution measures

A variability measure, which demonstrates how evenly a program’s funding is distributed across the country on a per capita basis. We only display this score, which starts at 0, for state-level, formula-funded programs.

A disadvantage measure, which shows the share of funding a program allocates to counties that experience disproportionate environmental or socioeconomic burden.

A persistent poverty measure, which shows the share of funding a program allocates to counties with a poverty rate of 20 percent or higher for three decades.

Select an equity measure

Concentration measure

Data level

indicator Equity score
Population share who are people of color visualization of equity score

0.11

Poverty rate visualization of equity score

-0.78

Median household income visualization of equity score

-0.86

Population density visualization of equity score

0.95

Miles of subway or light rail visualization of equity score

2.05

Public transit commute share visualization of equity score

2

Green commute share visualization of equity score

1.71

Vehicle trips per household visualization of equity score

1.35

Commute time visualization of equity score

1.12

Car access visualization of equity score

0.52

Public transit stops visualization of equity score

0.16

Transportation staff capacity visualization of equity score

-0.07

Miles of highway visualization of equity score

-0.51

Annual vehicle miles per household visualization of equity score

-0.81

Job density visualization of equity score

-0.96

Transportation costs visualization of equity score

-0.98

How Is Funding Distributed by Community Characteristic?

For each program, we’ve analyzed how funding is distributed along different community characteristics. For counties, we show these distributions of funding by quintiles, and for states, we show these distributions by quartiles.

Population share who are people of color
County

Funding is on average higher for counties with a higher population share who are people of color than for counties with a lower population share who are people of color compared with the national average.

Average program funding per 1,000 residents

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 0.0%-7.0% 7.0%-13.0% 13.0%-24.4% 24.4%-43.1% 43.1%+

Population share who are people of color by county

Project Credits

This data tool was funded by a grant from the Melville Charitable Trust as part of the Partnership for Equitable and Resilient Communities Initiative. We are grateful to them and to all our funders, who make it possible for Urban to advance its mission. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Funders do not determine research findings or the insights and recommendations of our experts. More information on our funding principles is available here. Read our terms of service here.