Search for a type of infrastructure, a federal program, or a geography.

Alabama

On this page, we’ve included all funds distributed within Alabama from the programs we've evaluated. Many of those funds are distributed to local governments and private entities, not used by the state government.

programtotal funding
National Highway Performance Program$568,540,380
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program$276,587,212
Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program$100,000,000
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund for lead service line replacement$91,059,860
Rural Development Broadband ReConnect Program$78,465,175
Appalachian Development Highway System$73,875,000
Highway Safety Improvement Program$59,419,156
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund$57,792,630
Railroad Crossing Elimination Grant Program$53,508,222
Bridge Formula Program$45,000,000
Urbanized Area Formula Grants Program$32,625,171
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund emerging contaminants$32,572,000
Clean Water State Revolving Fund$29,652,490
Enabling Middle Mile Grant Program$29,037,609
Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-Saving Transportation (PROTECT) - Formula Program$28,042,870
Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity Grant Program$27,179,948
National Highway Freight Program$26,311,354
Carbon Reduction Program$24,662,360
Natural Gas Distribution Infrastructure Safety and Modernization Grant Program$22,684,294
Low or No Emission Vehicle Program$21,544,701
Clean School Bus Program$20,540,000
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program$12,429,947
National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program$11,738,801
Airport Terminals Program$11,260,000
Highway Safety Programs$11,222,501
Formula Grants for Rural Areas Program, Growing State Apportionments, Growing States and High-Density States Program (combined)$6,948,942
Grants for Buses and Bus Facilities Formula Program$6,645,271
Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program$6,096,415
Railway-Highway Crossing Program$5,047,891
Metropolitan Planning Program$4,056,177
Weatherization Assistance Program$3,150,810
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program$2,417,100
Clean Water State Revolving Fund supplemental appropriation for emerging contaminants$2,090,000
Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Program$1,789,916
Federal Transit Administration Metropolitan, Statewide, and Non-Metropolitan Planning$1,530,550
Tribal Transportation Program$1,157,825
Reconnecting Communities Pilot Program$800,000

Where Is Funding Distributed?

National Highway Performance Program

Funding amount per 1,000 residents

$0
$81k
$98k
$120k

Compare funding received by state

National Highway Performance Program

Other states

Alabama

Notes: X-axis of chart is scaled logarithmically

Is Infrastructure Funding Allocated Equitably?

For each federal program, we compared a jurisdiction’s percentile for per-capita funding received with that jurisdiction’s percentiles along a number of different demographic and need indicators. A number above 0 means a program is overfunding a jurisdiction compared with the selected indicator, and a number below 0 means the program is underfunding the jurisdiction compared with the selected indicator.

indicator Equity score
Share of population who are people of color visualization of equity score

0.14

Poverty rate visualization of equity score

-0.16

Population density visualization of equity score

0.25

Median household income visualization of equity score

-0.18

Person trips per household visualization of equity score

0.41

Car access per household visualization of equity score

0.35

Miles of highway visualization of equity score

0.19

Transportation staff capacity visualization of equity score

0.17

Annual vehicle miles per household visualization of equity score

-0.13

Fatal accident frequency visualization of equity score

-0.19

Project Credits

This data tool was funded by the Melville Charitable Trust as part of the Partnership for Equitable and Resilient Communities Initiative. We are grateful to them and to all our funders, who make it possible for Urban to advance its mission. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Funders do not determine research findings or the insights and recommendations of our experts. More information on our funding principles is available here. Read our terms of service here.