Search for a type of infrastructure, a federal program, or a geography.

State Planning and Research Program Subpart B (SPR-B)

Department of Transportation

This program offers states funding to develop innovative, research-driven solutions to increasingly complex transportation challenges. The money can go toward planning, design, construction, and maintenance of highways and public transportation systems. Learn more at www.fhwa.dot.gov.

Where Is Funding Distributed?

Compare funding distribution by state

$1,003,066,033

Formula

Competitive

How equitably were funds distributed?

To explore how programs distribute funding compared with community characteristics, we developed several equity measures:

A concentration measure, which shows how much of a program’s funding is distributed to jurisdictions with the greatest share of a selected community characteristic. Scores range from −1 to 3.

Distribution measures

A variability measure, which demonstrates how evenly a program’s funding is distributed across the country on a per capita basis. We only display this score, which starts at 0, for state-level, formula-funded programs.

A disadvantage measure, which shows the share of funding a program allocates to counties that experience disproportionate environmental or socioeconomic burden.

A persistent poverty measure, which shows the share of funding a program allocates to counties with a poverty rate of 20 percent or higher for three decades.

Select an equity measure

Concentration measure
indicator Equity score
Population share who are people of color visualization of equity score

-0.09

Poverty rate visualization of equity score

0.15

Median household income visualization of equity score

0.04

Population density visualization of equity score

-0.17

Annual vehicle miles per household visualization of equity score

0.27

Miles of highway visualization of equity score

0.23

Bridges visualization of equity score

0.23

Contaminated site exposure visualization of equity score

0.22

Fatal accident frequency visualization of equity score

0.12

Air quality visualization of equity score

0.11

visualization of equity score

0.08

Bridges in poor condition visualization of equity score

0.01

Vehicle trips per household visualization of equity score

-0.01

Car access visualization of equity score

-0.05

Transportation staff capacity visualization of equity score

-0.05

Ozone concentration visualization of equity score

-0.08

Public transit stops visualization of equity score

-0.11

Green commute share visualization of equity score

-0.13

Miles of subway or light rail visualization of equity score

-0.16

Public transit commute share visualization of equity score

-0.17

Train use frequency visualization of equity score

-0.18

Diesel exhaust concentration visualization of equity score

-0.18

Bus use frequency visualization of equity score

-0.18

Commute time visualization of equity score

-0.19

Greenhouse gas exposure visualization of equity score

-0.2

How Is Funding Distributed by Community Characteristic?

For each program, we’ve analyzed how funding is distributed along different community characteristics. For counties, we show these distributions of funding by quintiles, and for states, we show these distributions by quartiles.

Population share who are people of color

Funding is on average lower for states with a higher population share who are people of color than for states with a lower population share who are people of color compared with the national average.

Average program funding per 1,000 residents

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 0.0%-19.4% 19.4%-26.6% 26.6%-43.6% 43.6%+

Population share who are people of color by state

Project Credits

This data tool was funded by a grant from the Melville Charitable Trust as part of the Partnership for Equitable and Resilient Communities Initiative. We are grateful to them and to all our funders, who make it possible for Urban to advance its mission. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Funders do not determine research findings or the insights and recommendations of our experts. More information on our funding principles is available here. Read our terms of service here.