Program overview
State Planning and Research Program Subpart B (SPR-B)
State Planning and Research Program Subpart B (SPR-B)
Department of Transportation
This program offers states funding to develop innovative, research-driven solutions to increasingly complex transportation challenges. The money can go toward planning, design, construction, and maintenance of highways and public transportation systems. Learn more at www.fhwa.dot.gov.
Geographic Share
Where Is Funding Distributed?
Compare funding distribution by state
Total Funding
$1,003,066,033
Funding Type
Formula
Competitive
Equity measures
How equitably were funds distributed?
To explore how programs distribute funding compared with community characteristics, we developed several equity measures:
A concentration measure, which shows how much of a program’s funding is distributed to jurisdictions with the greatest share of a selected community characteristic. Scores range from −1 to 3.
Distribution measures
A variability measure, which demonstrates how evenly a program’s funding is distributed across the country on a per capita basis. We only display this score, which starts at 0, for state-level, formula-funded programs.
A disadvantage measure, which shows the share of funding a program allocates to counties that experience disproportionate environmental or socioeconomic burden.
A persistent poverty measure, which shows the share of funding a program allocates to counties with a poverty rate of 20 percent or higher for three decades.
Select an equity measure
| indicator | Equity score |
|---|---|
| Population share who are people of color | -0.09 |
| Poverty rate | 0.15 |
| Median household income | 0.04 |
| Population density | -0.17 |
| Annual vehicle miles per household | 0.27 |
| Miles of highway | 0.23 |
| Bridges | 0.23 |
| Contaminated site exposure | 0.22 |
| Fatal accident frequency | 0.12 |
| Air quality | 0.11 |
| 0.08 | |
| Bridges in poor condition | 0.01 |
| Vehicle trips per household | -0.01 |
| Car access | -0.05 |
| Transportation staff capacity | -0.05 |
| Ozone concentration | -0.08 |
| Public transit stops | -0.11 |
| Green commute share | -0.13 |
| Miles of subway or light rail | -0.16 |
| Public transit commute share | -0.17 |
| Train use frequency | -0.18 |
| Diesel exhaust concentration | -0.18 |
| Bus use frequency | -0.18 |
| Commute time | -0.19 |
| Greenhouse gas exposure | -0.2 |
Community comparison
Funding is on average lower for states with a higher population share who are people of color than for states with a lower population share who are people of color compared with the national average.
Average program funding per 1,000 residents
Population share who are people of color by state
Project Credits
This data tool was funded by a grant from the Melville Charitable Trust as part of the Partnership for Equitable and Resilient Communities Initiative. We are grateful to them and to all our funders, who make it possible for Urban to advance its mission. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Funders do not determine research findings or the insights and recommendations of our experts. More information on our funding principles is available here. Read our terms of service here.
- research Yonah Freemark, Amanda Hermans, Gabe Samuels, Tomi Rajninger, Sam Lieberman, Teddy Maginn, Mel Langness, and David Blount
- Design Brittney Spinner
- Data visualization and development Mitchell Thorson
- Editing Lauren Lastowka
- Writing Wesley Jenkins
View the project on Github